Kris Jenkins interviews the creator of the Elm programming language, Evan Czaplicki. Evan has been quite elusive in public since 2019 when Elm was put into stasis with the 0.19.1 release. So it’s interesting to hear a little more about what he’s been working on and some of the deep thinking he’s done around the sustainability of open-source and programming languages.

I am clearly biased but one bit that missed the mark for me was when Kris asked the following:

Okay, so I want to come at that from another angle as well because there is definitely a sense that more immediately accessible languages get success in disseminating ideas. But I also, it makes me think of another language which doesn’t have immediately accessible ideas and yet is being very successful and it’s Rust. Hmm. Right? What’s your, not what’s your take on Rust, what’s your take on why Rust is succeeding in mindshare?

Evan’s answer seemed to boil down to: Rust is succeeding because it had funding from Mozilla and that Mozilla was a trusted entity. Perhaps that helped get it off the ground, but the project has been independent of Mozilla since the 1.0 release in 2015 and since then has seen adoption from large organisations like AWS, Google, and Microsoft—clearly they see value in it outside its association with Mozilla. Mozilla’s contributions also dramatically decreased in 2020 when Mozilla laid off many of the folks that it was paying to contribute to Rust.

Aside from that, the interview is interesting and insightful. I fear that Elm may have lost the bulk of the momentum it had in the 5 years since the last release, so I’m not sure how Evan’s server-side solution will fare if/when it is released. However, I am hoping it achieves enough success to be sustainable for him.

Phil Hagelberg (aka Technomancy):

I’ve been on Mastodon since early 2017 and have really enjoyed it. It’s been great to see the Fediverse grow as a user-owned network that can function without a corporate overlord calling the shots, exploiting the user base, and ultimately squeezing it to death for monetization. There are plenty of problems that remain, but one of the biggest ones is that new users have to find an instance to sign up on, and this can be tricky. Installing and administering a Mastodon instance is a lot of work. The liberatory function of the network is only as good as peoples’ ability to make use of it, which requires running servers. If running a server is hard, fewer people are going to do it, and the power is going to be concentrated in the hands of a technical elite. A healthy network must make it easy to avoid this kind of centralization; to do that we have to look beyond Mastodon.

In 2019 I ran my own fediverse server out of my home on Pleroma for about a year; eventually shutting it down for a few different reasons. Then I started hearing more and more about this new GotoSocial server whose goal was to make it easy to run your own instance, and, well, I liked what I saw!

I followed a similar path to Technomancy with my Fediverse presence. I started off on mastodon.social in 2017, then migrated to a self-hosted Pleroma instance for a three-and-half of years. At the start of 2023 I was tired of incompatibilities between Pleroma and Mastodon clients (not really Pleroma’s fault) and looked into alternatives.

GotoSocial showed a huge amount of promise but it was nowhere near ready at the time, so I went with a personal Mastodon instance hosted by masto.host, which has worked out well. I’ve kept an eye on GotoSocial though, and they continue to make steady progress toward a complete ActivityPub server.

Chawan is a web browser for your terminal implemented in Nim:

Currently implemented features are:

• multi-processing, incremental loading of documents
• multi-charset, double-width aware text display (but no bi-di yet)
• HTML5 support, forms, cookies
• CSS-based layout engine: supports flow layout, table layout, flexbox layout
• user-programmable keybindings (defaults are vi(m)-like)
• basic JavaScript support in documents (disabled by default for security reasons)
• supports several protocols: HTTP(S), FTP, Gopher, Gemini, Finger, etc.
• user-defined protocols and file formats
• markdown viewer, man page viewer
• sixel/kitty image support
• mouse support
• syscall sandboxing on FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Linux (through capsicum, pledge and seccomp-bpf)

I tried it out on my personal blog and it produced a very respectable rendering of the home page. Including the header and flexbox side bar.

Lars Wirzenius:

Debian is a large, complex operating system, and a huge open source project. It’s thirty years old now. To many people, some of its aspects are weird. Most such things have a good reason, but it can be hard to find out what it is. This is an attempt to answer some such questions, without being a detailed history of the project.

I’m personally not a huge fan of Debian, mainly due to the myth that by shipping outdated software it’s somehow more stable than distros that ship up-to-date software. For example, yesterday I saw a post where a person identified a bug in some software only to contact the Debian maintainer and discover a fix had already been applied but it would take a couple of months to make it into an update—this does not sound more stable to me.

Anyway, this post has a good premise of trying to explain why Debian is the way it is and I found that useful.

Ryan Dahl writing on the Deno blog:

On November 22, 2024, Deno formally filed a petition with the USPTO to cancel Oracle’s trademark for “JavaScript.” This marks a pivotal step toward freeing “JavaScript” from legal entanglements and recognizing it as a shared public good.

If successful, the petition will eliminate barriers that have stifled community use of the name. Conferences could reclaim titles like “JavaScript Conference” instead of settling for “JSConf.” The language’s specification could finally drop the cumbersome “ECMAScript” moniker and be known simply as the “JavaScript Specification.” Communities like “Rust for JavaScript Developers” would no longer fear legal threats over their use of the term.

It seems that it’s not widely known that Oracle own the JavaScript trademark. It’s something that they inherited from Sun, which licensed the name to Netscape.

To me it’s obvious that Oracle hasn’t been using the trademark, but they have a lot of lawyers and deep pockets. Good luck to the Deno folks, it would be nice to free the name from ambiguity.